Mr. Mubin Aslam Noorani
Aged : 32 years
Occ: Supervisor
R/at : Noori Chawl, Maharashtra Nagar,
Abdul Hamid Road, near Mangal Murti hospital,
Malwani (West), Mumbai- 400 095
The State of Maharashtra
At the instance of Dongri police station, Mumbai, vide C.R. No.437/2024
CORAM : SHRI. MAHESH K. JADHAV ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE (C.R.43)
DATE : 10/01/2025
1. This is an application taken out by applicant/accused Mr. Mubin Aslam Noorani under section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 for enlarging him on bail in C.R. No.437/2024 (now Special Case No.2649/2024) registered at Dongri police station, Mumbai for the offences punishable under section 8(c) r/w section 20(b) (ii) (b) and section 29 of Narcotic Drug and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred as “NDPS Act”).
2. Perused the application, documents filed therewith, reply of the prosecution and record of NDPS Special Case No.2649/2024. Heard, arguments advanced by Ld. Advocate for the applicant/accused and learned APP
3. Learned Advocate for applicant/accused submitted that, this is the first bail application taken out by the applicant/accused. No other bail application taken out by the applicant/accused in respect of the present crime is pending in Hon’ble High Court or rejected any superior court. Learned Advocate for applicant/accused argued that, as per the prosecution case on 24/10/2024 during patrolling the coaccused Yusuf Mussa Lakhani and applicant was found in suspicious condition and 415 gram Charas is alleged to be recovered. Therefore, offence punishable under section 8(c) r/w section 20(b) (ii) (b) and section 29 of the NDPS Act is registered against the applicant/accused and co-accused. Applicant/accused is innocent. He has committed no crime. He was falsely involved in the crime. There is no authorization certificate to conduct the search. The search was conducted by unauthorized officer. There is no independent positive evidence on record to show the nexus between the applicant/accused and co-accused. Therefore, there is no sufficient ground for proceeding again the applicant/accused. The applicant/accused is not having any criminal antecedent. Investigation is completed and charge-sheet is filed bearing NDPS Special Case No.2649/2024. Applicant/accused is resident of Mumbai and he is ready to abide by all terms and conditions which the Court may impose. Therefore, Ld. Advocate for the applicant/accused prayed that, applicant/accused be released on bail.
Ld. Advocate for the applicant/accused kept his reliance on the following citations :
This Court has gone through the observations made therein.
4. On the other hand, Ld. APP Shri. B.G. Rajput submitted that, Charas of 415 gram was recovered from the possession of the accused and co-accused. Release of the applicant/ accused may hamper further investigation. Applicant/accused may commit similar offences if released on bail. There are every chances of repetition of crime. Therefore, Ld. APP submitted that, application be rejected.
5. Applicant/accused is alleged to have committed offence punishable under section 8(c) r/w section 20(b) (ii) (b) and section 29 of the NDPS Act.
6. On perusal of charge-sheet it appears that,on 24/10/2024 during patrolling the co-accused Yusuf Mussa Lakhani and applicant was found in suspicious condition and 415 gram Charas is alleged to be recovered. There is no positive material on record to indicate nexus between applicant/ accused and co-accused. Now, investigation is completed and charge-sheet is filed. There is no Whats-app chat, CDR, monetary transaction to show nexus of applicant/accused with the coaccused. No material was seen from charge-sheet which indicate involvement of the applicant/accused in conspiracy. The contraband recovered from the accused and the co-accused is of intermediate quantity. There is no bar of Section 37 of NDPS Act is applicable.
7. Personal liberty is most precious of all fundamental rights. There is presumption of innocence unless the guilt is proved. The object of the bail is to secure the attendance of the accused at the trial and the object is neither punitive and preventive. From the material on record prima facie, it appears that, applicant/accused had co-operated during the investigation. Applicant/accused has also undertaken to co-operate during the trial. From prima facie appreciation of the material on record, presence of the applicant/accused is likely to be secured even if he is released on bail. Moreover, interest of the prosecution can be safeguarded by imposing certain conditions. Therefore, considering the above discussion and prima facie appreciation of material on record there appear no necessity for further detention of the accused for facilitating further full and fair investigation.
8. Considering the nature of offence, gravity of offence age and antecedents of the accused and from prima facie appreciation of the material on record release of the accused on bail is not likely to be prejudicial either to fair investigation or to the interest of society at large. Therefore, there appear justifiable grounds for releasing the applicant/accused on bail. As such the present application deserves to be allowed. Hence, the following order.
The learned Advocate for the applicant/accused relied upon the following decisions of the Hon’ble Bombay High Court:
This Court has gone through the observations made therein.
On perusal of charge-sheet it appears that,on 24/10/2024 during patrolling the co-accused Yusuf Mussa Lakhani and applicant was found in suspicious condition and 415 gram Charas is alleged to be recovered.
There is no positive material on record to indicate nexus between applicant/accused and co-accused. Now, investigation is completed and charge-sheet is filed. There is no Whats-app chat, CDR, monetary transaction to show nexus of applicant/ accused with the coaccused.
No material was seen from charge-sheet which indicate involvement of the applicant/accused in conspiracy. The contraband recovered from the accused and the co-accused is of intermediate quantity. There is no bar of Section 37 of NDPS Act is applicable.
Personal liberty is most precious of all fundamental rights. There is presumption of innocence unless the guilt is proved. The object of the bail is to secure the attendance of the accused at the trial and the object is neither punitive and preventive.
From the material on record prima facie, it appears that, applicant/accused had co-operated during the investigation. Applicant/accused has also undertaken to co-operate during the trial.
Considering the nature of offence, gravity of offence age and antecedents of the accused and from prima facie appreciation of the material on record release of the accused on bail is not likely to be prejudicial either to fair investigation or to the interest of society at large.
Criminal Bail Application No.2787 of 2024 is allowed and applicant/accused Mr. Mubin Aslam Noorani is released on bail.
1. Cri. BA No.2787/2024 of applicant/accused Mr. Mubin Aslam Noorani, in C.R. No.437/2024 in Special Case No.2649/2024, is allowed.
2. Applicant/accused Mr. Mubin Aslam Noorani, be released on bail in C.R. No.437/2024 registered at Dongri police station, Mumbai for offences under section 8(c) r/w section 20(b) (ii) (b) and section 29 of NDPS Act, 1985 on executing personal bond of Rs.50,000/- only (Rs. Fifty thousand only) with one or more sureties in like amount on the following conditions :
3. Cri. BA No.2787/2024 is disposed of accordingly.
Advocate Prem Kumar R. Pandey with an area of practice in Arbitration, Banking, Securities and Financial Services, Contracts, Criminal law, Corporate & Commercial, Real Estate & Property Law providing the best services for your case.
Consult Advocate Consult Advocate